The Adventures of Tintin

With no afternoon plans and a movie pass that expires at the end of the month, I opted to go see The Adventures of Tintin which had been on my radar for months (thanks to an extensive ad campaign). I'm really curious how many Americans like myself had little to no knowledge of the film's source material prior to the movie promotional campaign kicking into high gear. I had never even heard of intrepid boy reporter Tintin and his adventures until I started reading about what massive fans director Steven Spielberg and producer Peter Jackson are of the apparently somewhat legendary comic book series by Belgian author and artist Herge (Georges Remi). So that's probably why I came away from this film with somewhat mixed feelings -- it was good, just not the exhilarating, escapist adventure that I was expecting given the enthusiasm and filmic pedigree of the team that brought the story to the screen. I suspect Tintin is a movie made by fans of the source material that will resonate most strongly with fans of the same -- but I am very much open to hearing other views. :)

Tintin (voiced by Jamie Bell) is a boy wonder reporter, somewhat in the mold of Jimmy Olsen or Lois Lane (please, don't throw stones at my comparison -- I work with what I know, people). :) He has a penchant for adventure and is never without the accompaniment of his crazy-smart, faithful dog Snowy (an adorable terrier with a weakness for unguarded sandwiches). In an unspecified but very European 1930s outdoor market, Tintin purchases a model of the lost ship Unicorn. When two individuals promptly attempt to purchase the ship from him, including an unsavory fellow with the delightful name of Sakharine (voiced by the one and only Daniel Craig!), he senses a story -- an opinion that is solidified when his apartment is trashed and the ship is stolen, leaving behind an overlooked scroll with a cryptic clue, referencing at least twin models (and by extension additional clues).

In his quest to uncover the secret of the Unicorn, Tintin joins forces with the alcohol-swigging Captain Haddock (voiced by Andy Serkis), the sole surviving descendant of the original Unicorn's captain and the unwitting target of Sakharine's machinations. The quest to retreive all three clues necessary to discover the location of a treasure missing for centuries takes the unlikely duo (well, trio if you count Snowy, and personally I would) from Europe to Morocco and back again, dodging bullets and danger along the way.

This film took me back to my preteen infatuation with The Young Indiana Jones series, and any comparisons drawn between Tintin and Young Indy are to my thinking quite apt -- both young men hungry for adventure, with conveniently unlimited funds with which to travel the world (ha!), and a penchant for stopping baddies in their tracks. But personally there was a spark missing that made it somewhat difficult for me to "connect" with Tintin, and I think that lies in the medium of performance capture 3D animation. Now the format and style of filmmaking has come a long way since The Polar Express, but despite its realism there is still something that strikes me as soulless about the animation -- the faces and expressions often appear "flat" to me, an effect perhaps exaggerated by the realism of the clothing, hair, etc. Now I'm not trying to throw Bell under the proverbial bus -- I think he is a fantastic actor -- but in comparing his performance as Tintin to 3D performance capture veteran Andy Serkis, Tintin seems a bit flat.

That said, I really enjoyed the world this film created, very evocative of Indiana Jones's globetrotting adventures, and reminscent of movie serial adventures from the 1930s with its spirit of never-say-die adventure and optimism. The detail is incredible, and I found myself more than once distracted by the texture of clothing, the subtle alterations in a character's skin tone, a breeze blowing through hair, or the sheen of perspiration on Haddock's brow as he (unwillingly) weans himself off the bottle midway through the film. I also have to note Doctor Who and Sherlock veteran Steven Moffat's script contributions, which given my history with the man's work I suspect is greatly responsible for much of the film's humor. And John Williams delivers another impeccable score, alternating cues of high adventure with a whimsical, francophile-inspired themes that hearken back to the movie's 1930s serial style and time period.

I'm definitely intrigued see the planned sequel, particularly since it will be penned by Anthony Horowitz (FOYLE'S WAR!!!). For a grey Sunday afternoon's entertainment, The Adventures of Tintin was an enjoyable introduction to a previously unknown hero, a throwback-style adventure, where the hero relies on smarts and ingenuity to save the day and land the story of a lifetime. :)

Little Dorrit, Part Three

If you’re wary of spoilers, stop here.

Click to read my reviews of part one and part two of Little Dorrit if you need to catch up on the action from the last two weeks. Here’s the brief summary of episode three from the Masterpiece Classic website:

The villainous Rigaud (under an assumed name), begins an extortion scheme against Mrs. Clennam. Pancks uncovers information that dramatically alters the future for the Dorrits. Now able to move beyond his shameful past, Mr. Dorrit enlists the help of Mrs. General to instruct his daughters in etiquette. Disquieted by all the sudden changes, Amy continues her connection with Arthur through letters, and forges a closer relationship with Pet Meagles.

As I mentioned in part two’s review, I missed Mrs. Clennam’s (Judy Parfitt) cold presence and I couldn’t wait to see her interact with the murderous Rigaud (Andy Serkis). Happily, episode three starts off by gratifying both desires right away. Rigaud’s introduction to the House of Clennam was actually pretty funny. Poor Affery (Sue Johnston) may be constantly beaten down, but she’s still smart enough to recognize that Rigaud is not to be trusted. Her reaction to Rigaud climbing into the house, monkey-style, was priceless. All of Rigaud’s screentime in this episode really served to once again drive home Andy Serkis’s incredible versatility as an actor. Where Rigaud was just inexplicably creepy before, now Serkis layers on some darkly comic overtones to his presentation of the character (seen when he latches on to the Gowans), which make the murderous Frenchman seem even more threatening (and who thought that was possible?!).

Mr. Pancks (Eddie Marsan) continues to provide some welcome moments of comic relief. His joy over his success in discovering Mr. Dorrit’s lost inheritance is genuine and heartfelt. I also appreciated the dichotomy between the joy and fulfillment he finds in detective work versus his “day job” as a rent collector for the slumlord Mr. Casby. Pancks is definitely one of the “good guys” who’s stuck in the difficult situation of working for an unscrupulous landlord – perhaps this explains, at least in part, his happiness in being able to help someone who has been wronged by the system like Amy Dorrit. And Amy returns the favor by passing on her new-found blessings. In Amy, Dickens gives us a character proving that riches don’t make a lady – instead, in the right hands, wealth merely enhances a person’s character, as it does in Amy’s case when she shuns opportunities for self-aggrandizement and helps deserving friends like the Plornishes instead.

Speaking of the Dorrits, I am so over Mr. Dorrit by now. After his mini-meltdown last week, I was willing to give him the benefit of a doubt and cut him some slack. Last week, Tom Courtenay did an excellent job of portraying the cost imprisonment in the Marshalsea inflicted on William Dorrit’s mental and physical health. However, there’s a point where people need to take responsibility for themselves and not act like complete jerks when their fortunes change. After Arthur – out of the goodness of his heart, for pete’s sake! – takes it upon himself to “adopt” the Dorrits, investigate their situation, and show the family multiple kindnesses, he’s unceremoniously kicked to the curb as soon as Mr. Dorrit learns of his pending inheritance. It was positively painful to watch poor Arthur get treated like crap by the pretentious Dorrits (excluding Amy, of course, as well as her uncle Frederick), when they owe their good fortune entirely to the fact that he took the initiative to investigate their history! The behavior of Mr. Dorrit, his son Tip, and daughter Fanny is just plain awful – extraordinarily distasteful and selfish. I’m so over the whole lot of them!

This brings me to one of my favorite subjects to discuss…the character of Arthur, and by extension Matthew Macfadyen’s mad acting skills. LOL! Now that Arthur has no hope of marrying Pet Meagles (Georgia King) since she became engaged to artist Henry Gowan (Alex Wyndham), he’s left to nurse crushed hopes and, wonder of wonders, loosen up a bit and start to show some genuine appreciation for Amy and her constant friendship (when he carries her out to the coach after she faints – wowzers, that moment was fantastic!). One of the things I loved about Macfadyen’s portrayal of Mr. Darcy in Pride and Prejudice 2005 was how he became a completely different person when he smiled – the storm clouds broke and the sunlight shone through. Arthur’s flashes of happiness had the same effect on me during last night’s episode – only perhaps they were a bit more poignant, because Arthur is really a criminally under-appreciated guy, and with his family background he clearly wasn’t given much to smile about. Watching Arthur journey from a place of emptiness and un-fulfillment into increased confidence, joy, and self-worth has been a rewarding experience thus far. He’s an easy character to cheer for – he’s not entirely a doormat, and he’s not a perfect, heroic ideal. He’s an everyday guy who’s taken more than his share of knocks who has this unshakeable desire to do the right thing, and be a decent human being, that makes him wonderfully relatable.

Once the Dorrits are freed from Marshalsea Prison, Mr. Dorrit engages Mrs. General (Pam Ferris) to prepare his children to take their “rightful” place in society. It was a real treat to see Pam Ferris in this role (you may recognize her as Aunt Marge from Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban or as the sinister Grace Poole from Jane Eyre 2006). She’s hilarious being all fussy and proper and mercenary, all at the same time. Mrs. General encourages Mr. Dorrit to take his family on a “grand tour” of Europe – and while abroad the Dorrits meet the Gowans. Here is where the Rigaud mystery gets even murkier – Rigaud knows the seriously whacked-out Miss Wade (Maxine Peake), a.k.a. the corrupter of Tattycoram. She sent him after the Gowans, encouraging him to ingratiate himself with the easily swayed Henry, and to take advantage, if he can, of any encounter with Amy Dorrit. Some of the pieces of the puzzle are coming together. Perhaps Rigaud’s targeting of Mrs. Clennam isn’t a mere “lucky chance” - I think there’ s a history that’s yet to be revealed, involving more players than I’d ever dreamed (i.e. Miss Wade).

One of my favorite aspects of episode three was how Amy & Arthur’s relationship developed through letters during the latter half of this episode. There’s something so incredibly romantic about a relationship forged through the written word, isn’t there? There’s a couple of things going on here, but perhaps the most important being Amy’s subtle defiance of her father by refusing to disown Arthur. Amy is blossoming into a true lady, developing a backbone, and proving again and again that she’s the most genuine, honorable member of her rag-tag family. She even shows admirable compassion towards her rival for Arthur's affections, Pet. Claire Foy adds depth to her portrayal of Amy with each succeeding episode. Primarily she has achieved the delicate feat of being a perfectly sweet heroine who’s not annoying - and that is quite a feat in my book. LOL!

Needless to say, I cannot WAIT for part four this coming Sunday!

If you need to catch up on episodes of Little Dorrit, you can watch online at the PBS website.

Little Dorrit, Part Two

Here there be spoilers...

So I know this recap of Little Dorrit, part two is long overdue, but what can I say - it's been an insane week. I came down with a NASTY cold Tuesday which really knocked me out of commission until yesterday, and then today has been all about tornado dodging.

Anyway, we'll dive right in...if you need a refresher, here's my post covering episode one. Here's a the short summary of episode two from the Masterpiece Classic website:

Romance and heartbreak are in the air. John Chivery proposes to Amy Dorrit, while Arthur Clennam's aspirations for Pet Meagles become deflated after meeting another suitor, Henry Gowan. Meanwhile, Flora Finching, concerned that Arthur's attention is being distracted by Amy, brings Amy to work for her. Opportunistic Fanny Dorrit leads on smitten Edmund Sparkler, stepson of famed banker Mr. Merdle.

Cavalletto arrives in London, only to discover he has been followed by Rigaud. Learning of a box that contains Mrs. Clennam's secrets, Rigaud senses an opportunity.

Mr. Pancks continues his investigation on Arthur's behalf. He recruits John Chivery and a lawyer for help.

Tattycoram, outraged at what she considers poor treatment, declares she is leaving the Meagleses for good. Mr. Meagles watches with great concern.

The events set in motion in part one begin to gain momentum with this installment. First off I have to give a nod to Russell Tovey's positively heart-rending performance as assistant turnkey John Chivery in this episode. We start off with his preparations for proposing to Amy Dorrit, and then in a mere few minutes we're (well, I was, anyway) crushed when Amy turns him down. He is so stinking adorable!!! I LOVE his character!! It takes quite a guy to have his love rejected and still want the best for the woman in question, even willing to still go to great lengths to try and help her family situation. I so want his character to end happily, but I'm very much afraid his broken heart is going to stick around... *sigh*

I thought the fallout from this proposal provided some really interesting insight into William Dorrit's character. Honestly, he was really getting on my nerves a bit last week with all of the airs and pretensions he insisted on putting on while in prison. He seemed like he was burdening Amy unnecessarily, and perhaps even purposefully. However, William's mini-meltdown was packed with more emotional punch than I was expecting, quite honestly. You really see the awful tragedy of William's character, and how his imprisonment was dually a prison and a sort of emotional shelter. When he's given the opportunity to simply step into the street, but can't because the open, chaotic space frightens him - that scene speaks volumes as to the toll of his imprisonment.

Arthur's infatuation with Pet Meagles was dispatched a little quicker than I was expecting. However, the pacing is part of what makes a show like this such engrossing viewing. I am hooked on the show and the characters the same way I was when watching Bleak House when it first aired. The scripting, and the way the show is filmed forces you to pay close attention - you literally can't look away because every scene and every character ends up being interconnected in some way that proves critical later on.

Andy Serkis's character Rigaud is perhaps even more menacing in this episode than previously (and he was pretty cold-hearted last week). Rigaud's scenes this week really drive home the fact that he's a completely lethal, amoral, opportunistic loose cannon. I may be reading the scene wrong, but when he kills Flintwinch's brother I don't think he was targeting him on purpose - I think he saw an opportunity and took it. If anyone reads the scene differently, let me know your perspective. He is one scary guy, and I cannot wait to see his interactions with the glacial Mrs. Clennam.

I absolutely LOVE Matthew Macfadyen in this series. I can't imagine another actor playing the character of Arthur with a better mix of sweetness, uncertainty, and...how can I say it...upright, moral resolve. Poor Arthur is so clueless about his affect on Amy...I just want to smack him upside the head. And give him a good, teeth-rattling shake to boot - especially when he tries to get Amy to rethink her refusal of John's proposal. (Why are men so clueless? WHY? LOL!) However, I have to give Arthur some credit for stepping out and establishing himself in business away from his family in this episode. It will be interesting to see how Arthur's business ventures develop, especially with the introduction of Mr. Merdle (Anton Lesser), the fabulously wealthy banker - when he appeared on screen there was practically a neon sign flashing "Ponzi scheme" over his head...okay, so I made that part up, but you just know that's where the story is going to go!

Likewise, Claire Foy has continued to impress me with her nuanced performance as Amy. This episode gives a little more insight into Amy's character and her interactions with her family - particularly with her dancer sister, Fanny, who's not above using her feminine charms to get her way. By contrast, seeing Amy so hopelessly, nobly pine away for Arthur is heart-breaking. I mean when she throws his stupid button into the sea...I was ready to give her a hug and say "girl, I understand." LOL!!

There is some priceless comic relief in this episode, supplied by Arthur's ex Flora and the aspiring detective Mr. Pancks. Also have to mention Flora's aunt (or aunt-in-law might be a more precise way of describing her) - Annette Crosbie may not have a lot of screentime, but she steals the show every time she opens her mouth! And I'm loving Pancks's character, but the man needs to work on his social skills - when he's being cryptic he comes off a tad creepy. LOL!

Needless to say, I can't wait to find out the next chapter of the story. I hope we see more of Mrs. Clennam in episode three - I rather missed her creepy, icy presence in this last installment. I'm also ready for Arthur to start to realize that Amy's nuts about him... There's a whole slew of other minor characteres I could mention, but I think I've hit the high points. Does anyone have any thoughts to add?

Little Dorrit, Part One

Get ready people - this is a long post. But an epic miniseries deserves an epic, long post, don't you think? ;-)

In watching part one of Little Dorrit last night on Masterpiece Classic, to say I was riveted would be an understatement. Part one was fantastic, and if the rest of Little Dorrit lives up to the promise of last night’s two hours, this is hands down the best Masterpiece presentation in years – probably since Bleak House. Here’s the spoiler-free summary of episode one from the PBS website:

Amy "Little" Dorrit lives in the Marshalsea Prison for Debt caring for her father William Dorrit. To aid her family, Amy works for stern shut-in Mrs. Clennam. Son Arthur Clennam returns from China after his father's death, haunted by his father's final, mysterious words. Is there a long-buried family secret and does it somehow involve Amy and her family?

Settling back into English life, Arthur gets reacquainted with former sweetheart Flora Finching, although true affections are saved for Pet Meagles. Meanwhile, in Paris, sinister murderer Rigaud considers coming to England.

Having now befriended Amy and her family, Arthur makes a financial offering to help one member of the Dorrits. Amy's appreciation and affection for Arthur grows as John Chivery, a turnkey at the Marshalsea who has a longtime love for Amy, watches heartbroken.

To probe more deeply into the Dorrit mystery, Arthur enlists rent collector Mr. Pancks for help, leaving Arthur free to visit the Meagleses. While there, Arthur becomes troubled by Tattycoram (who lives with the Meagleses), and her mysterious connection to Miss Wade.

Now, any and all spoiler free bets are off as I’m going to rip into the episode. (Though since I’ve never read the book – actually never even heard of it until this miniseries was announced – I don’t think you have too much to worry about if you’re concerned with spoilers!)

I can already tell that it’s going to take a couple of viewings of Little Dorrit to get a really good grasp of the multiple plotlines and the huge cast of characters thrown our way (in true Dickensian fashion). The scope and feel of this program immediately recalls the epic Bleak House, presented by Masterpiece in 2006 (hard to believe it’s already been three years!). Both productions were adapted by screenwriter Andrew Davies, who has proven time and again eminently suited to bringing classics to the screen. The broader the scope of the source material, the better I think one can appreciate Davies’s talent for honing it into compelling, relatable television.

Claire Foy plays the title character Amy (“Little Dorrit”), and according to the IMDB, this is her first major role and only her third acting credit. Thus far I’m incredibly impressed with her screen presence and believe she’s going to do an excellent job anchoring this epic miniseries. Her relatively slight frame is in keeping with her character’s name, but she has these wonderfully large, expressive eyes that lend her face a luminous quality. She’s not flashy, but she has an arresting presence – it’s clear that Amy is a character that’s borne much, but the burdens of life haven’t robbed her personality of kindness and strength.

And now we come to the main reason I was excited about this program – the presence of Matthew Macfadyen as our noble hero Arthur Clennam. I fell in love with Matthew when he brought his own unique merits to the character of Mr. Darcy in the 2005 film version of Pride & Prejudice. Arthur definitely comes across as a little less polished, less self-assured than Darcy – that is in no small part no doubt due to being treated like crap by his crazy mother (more on her later). So far, Arthur has proven to be rock-solid in the honor and loyalty departments. He’s also comes across as slightly befuddled, a bit unsure of himself, and that apparently stems from the lack of any sort of positive affirmation in his life. However, the fact that he’s such a good guy, and something of a catch to boot, and he doesn’t even realize it, makes him incredibly endearing. (Though I have a feeling that I’m going to want to smack him upside the head and yell “Wake up!!” before the show concludes – he’s a trifle dense.)

Arthur figures prominently in several of my favorite scenes from last night’s episode (surprise, surprise, I know). When he visits the Circumlocution Office in a futile attempt to find out why William Dorrit was imprisoned, the staging and setting of the scene is the perfect blend of social commentary and wry satire. The winding stairs and never-ending piles of paperwork provide a wonderful visual illustration of the futileness of Arthur’s quest and the general mess of the legal system as a whole. The whole scene was a great reminder of how some things haven’t changed all that much between now and Dickens’s time. I also loved the scene where he’s left his mother and is getting settled into his own place (finally!), and Amy and Maggy drop by because Amy knows he is responsible for rescuing her brother from a foolish racing debt. Matthew Macfadyen is just too stinking adorable for words in this scene as Arthur, obviously desperate for friends, practices playing host.

The Dorrits

Now I want to go back and briefly discuss some more of Amy’s family. Tom Courteney plays the Dorrit family patriarch William, who’s been in Marshalsea debtor’s prison for so many years he’s become known as the “father of Marshalsea.” Talk about a high-maintenance Daddy – one gets the impression that William has pretty well disconnected from reality, and actually enjoys being renowned as Marshalsea’s most famous resident.

James Fleet plays William’s well-intentioned but rather meek brother, Frederick, who’s not a Marshalsea resident and tries to help his brother’s family when and where he can. It was so much fun seeing Fleet on-screen again – his most famous role in my experience is as Hugo in the absolutely hilarious show The Vicar of Dibley. According to the credits, Frederick appears in all of Little Dorrit’s episodes, so I’m curious to see how his character may develop.

Amy has two siblings – Fanny, played by Emma Pierson, and Edward or “Tip,” played by Arthur Darvill. The main thing I can say about them is that if you compare them to Amy, she doesn’t just appear as good and sweet and kind, she comes off as an absolute saint with an unbelievably deep reservoir of patience for tolerating their self-centeredness.

Maggy, played by Eve Myles, is probably the closest thing Amy has to a true sister even though they aren’t actually related. She’s the mentally challenged granddaughter of Amy’s former nurse. Amy is devoted to Maggy and quite protective of her – and considering her own challenges of supporting a family that expects more than they’d ever dream of giving, Amy’s devotion to her friend further underscores her good nature.

The Chiverys of Marshalsea Prison

The Dorrits are watched over by the turnkey of Marshalsea Prison, Mr. Chivery (Ron Cook) and his son John (Russell Tovey), the assistant turnkey who is hopelessly in love with Amy. Their kind treatment of the Dorrits allows the family, particularly father William, to retain some shreds of dignity even while in prison. I absolutely LOVE John’s character. The entire time I was watching last night’s installment, I kept thinking “This is great! John’s like Guppy (from Bleak House), only better, because he’s adorable, sweet, and NOT INSANE.” I haven’t seen much of Tovey’s work, except for random episodes of Poirot or Doctor Who (he’s also in an upcoming Marple episode – look for that this summer!). But since he’s making such a good impression in this series, I have to predict good things for Tovey’s acting future. After all, Burn Gorman’s career really took off following his unforgettable turn as Guppy in Bleak House – then he appeared in Penelope, a Marple episode, Wuthering Heights, and a recurring role on Torchwood. Whenever I see Gorman on-screen I get this uncontrollable urge to jump up and down, point at the screen, and yell “Guppy! OMG it’s GUPPY!!” If John’s character continues to make a good impression, I can only sound (marginally) saner in the future yelling “John! OMG it’s JOHN!!” during forthcoming Tovey acting gigs (which I very much appreciate).

The House of Clennam

Mrs. Clennam, played by Judy Parfitt, is quite a character, to say the least. I think the first thing I can remember seeing her in was as Queen Marie in Ever After (note to self: haven’t seen that movie in ages, need to re-watch asap!). Mrs. Clennam has always ruled her family with an iron hand – apparently Arthur and his father went to the Far East for like fifteen years just to get away from her (which I completely understand given her behavior last night, just sayin’…). In an unusual flash of generous spirit, Mrs. Clennam hires Amy, providing her with some much-needed income. However, she refuses to divulge the reason to Arthur, or to shed light on the mystery he brings to her door in the form of a cryptic message found in his father’s pocketwatch. As an invalid, she’s lived in a gradually decaying old house for a dozen or so years – she reminds me just a bit of Miss Havisham from Great Expectations in that respect. She repeatedly rebuffs all of Arthur’s attempts to honor her with some token of filial respect, like a simple embrace – her treatment of him is quite chilling. Their whole relationship is a fascinating, dysfunctional trainwreck.

The other two residents of Clennam House are Jeremiah Flintwinch (Alun Armstrong) and his wife Affery (Sue Johnston). Armstrong has appeared in several Masterpiece adaptations, playing Daniel Peggotty in David Copperfield and Bucket in Bleak House. Jeremiah’s an interesting, deliciously sinister character. It’s unclear at this point whether or not his loyalty resides with anyone but himself. I feel just awful for his poor wife Affery (and not just because she has a goofy name) – thus far it appears he married her as part of some “grand plan” hatched with Mrs. Clennam, though why they had to join forces in marriage is anybody’s guess. Affery appears to have a kind heart but a very weak-willed nature, the latter tendency exacerbated by years of verbal and physical abuse at the hands of Mrs. Clennam and Flintwinch.

The Meagles Family

The role of the Meagles family is sure to grow and expand as Little Dorrit progresses. Arthur first meets the Meagles on his return voyage to London, and Mr. and Mrs. Meagles take an instant liking to him as a potential suitor for their daughter, Pet (seriously – Pet?!). Mr. Meagles is played by the wonderful Bill Paterson, who has appeared in Wives and Daughters, Doctor Zhivago, ShakespeaRe-Told, Foyle’s War, Miss Potter, and Amazing Grace. Mrs. Meagles is played by Janine Duvitski, who I first encountered when I started watching Waiting for God and One Foot in the Grave (both are hilarious British comedies from the 1990’s).

At this point, I don’t have much to say about the daughter, Pet (played by Georgia King), for a couple of reasons – she’s coming off as spoiled, vapid, empty-headed, and most unforgivable of all, Arthur apparently has a thing for her. Guys can be so annoying. This is the smack-Arthur-upside-the-head situation that I alluded to earlier. Why Pet, Arthur? Isn’t her name enough of a turn-off? You generally appear to be sensible, level-headed, and honorable…so wake up!! (I feel better having gotten that out of my system.) The final resident of the Meagles household is Tattycoram, an orphan they have taken in who has issues with the fact that she’s treated more like a servant rather than an adopted daughter. Tattycoram is played by Freema Agyeman, who I think, quite simply, rocks. She shot to fame as the smart and competent Martha, the Doctor’s companion in season three of Doctor Who. Tatty appears to be headed for trouble – she’s so dissatisfied with her lot in life that she’s ripe for corruption by the mysteriously sinister Miss Wade (played by Maxine Peake). I’m very curious to see where Dickens takes Tatty’s character as the story unfolds.

Etc.

Being a Dickens novel, there’s a whole host of other characters surrounding the main players, so I have to mention a few of the highlights that stood out to me last night.

Mr. Pancks (Eddie Marsan) is a hard-nosed debt collector whose character gets really interesting when Arthur hires him to try and discover why the Dorrits were imprisoned. Pancks reminds me just a bit of Alun Armstrong’s Bucket from Bleak House, so I’m very curious to see where the story takes his character.

Flora Finching (Ruth Jones) jilted Arthur once upon a time, and during his hiatus in the Far East has been married and widowed. Her altered appearance in the intervening years is initially played for a chuckle or two (filmed really well I might add), but she’s not a simple comic character. Flora makes no secret of the fact that she still harbors a passion for Arthur, and the fact that she is so transparent with her feelings lends the character some real emotional depth. I have to mention her crazy dead husband’s aunt that she “inherited,” played by the fabulous Annette Crosbie (The Slipper and the Rose, One Foot in the Grave). Her brief appearance as Mr. F.’s aunt was absolutely hilarious (the whole dining scene was a comic gem!), and I’m happy to see that she reappears later on in the series.

And finally, I have to mention the sinister Rigaud (also known as Blandois and Lagnier), played by none other than Andy Serkis! I had no idea that Serkis was in this miniseries, and I didn’t realize who was playing him until I started to really examine the cast list today. This is just further proof (as if we needed it) of Andy Serkis’s uncanny ability to completely disappear in a role – I had no idea who he was when watching last night! Honestly I was a bit confused as to how Rigaud fits into the puzzle that is Little Dorrit, so I’m very curious to see how Rigaud is brought into the center of the action, and what this cold-hearted killer’s appearance means for the good guys.

Everything about Little Dorrit screams of top-notch production values. The costumes are fantastic, and every single set is dense with detail and rich with atmosphere. Every frame, every scene of the story gives you a lot to “chew” on, and far too much to digest in simply one viewing. I make no secret of being a huge film score fan, so I have to give a shout-out to John Lunn for his gorgeous work here. And thank you, Andrew Davies – so far this adaptation is proving to be another sterling entry in your resume of outstanding work.

Is Little Dorrit the equal of Bleak House? That remains to be seen. However, for what it’s worth in my opinion this promises to be the best costume drama to come from the BBC since Bleak House and maybe Cranford (almost forgot the latter!).

You can read more about Little Dorrit at the Masterpiece Classic website.
For a limited time, you can watch full episodes of Little Dorrit online.
Pre-order the Little Dorrit DVD (releases April 28th).

You can see a few more pictures of the cast of characters at my Xanga site - I'm finding that Xanga is a lot more "photo-friendly" than Blogger for ease when formatting picture-heavy posts.